[SEC CASE NO. 3210. September 4, 1987.]
CONPHARM INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL., petitioners, vs. ALBERTO A. SANTILLANA, respondent.
O R D E R
Exhibits "1", "1-A", "8", "9", "10", "10-B", "C", "12" and "12-A" of the respondent are all hereby admitted for the purpose for which they are being offered.
However, there being objections to the purpose for which they are being offered, Exhibits "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7" and "11" are hereby admitted only as part of the testimonies of the witnesses presented.
Petitioners' prayer for the issuance of a writ of preliminary injunction is now considered submitted for resolution.
SO ORDERED.
(SGD.) ALBERTO P. ATAS
Hearing Officer