Case digest LOCAL WATER UTILITIES ADMINISTRATION EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION FOR PROGRESS v. LOCAL WATER UTILITIES ADMINISTRATION and DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET & MANAGEMENT - Decisions

Legal Research Decisions LOCAL WATER UTILITIES ADMINISTRATION EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION FOR PROGRESS v. LOCAL WATER UTILITIES ADMINISTRATION and DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET & MANAGEMENT Digest list Case Digest

Back to case

LOCAL WATER UTILITIES ADMINISTRATION EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION FOR PROGRESS v. LOCAL WATER UTILITIES ADMINISTRATION and DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET & MANAGEMENT

Remedial

Ponente: PERALTA, J.

Decision Date: 2016-09-07

GR Number: G.R. No. 206808-09

Digest Team 4 months ago

Avg. Rating:

Summary:

This case involves a petition for certiorari filed by the Local Water Utilities Administration Employees Association for Progress (LEAP) and other employees against the Local Water Utilities Administration (LWUA) and the Department of Budget and Management (DBM). The petitioners challenged the implementation of a reorganization plan and the approval of a staffing pattern by LWUA and DBM. The Regional Trial Court (RTC) initially granted the petitioners' prayer for a writ of preliminary injunction, but the Court of Appeals (CA) reversed this decision. The CA held that the petitioners failed to establish an actual case or controversy and that they should have exhausted administrative remedies before resorting to court action. The petitioners filed a motion for reconsideration, which was denied by the CA.

Doctrine:

The doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies requires parties to avail themselves of all administrative processes before seeking intervention from the court. This doctrine is based on practical and legal reasons, such as cost-effectiveness and the expertise of administrative agencies in resolving technical matters. The doctrine of primary jurisdiction further supports the exhaustion of administrative remedies, as courts should defer to administrative tribunals when the resolution of a question requires their specialized knowledge and discretion.

Facts:

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Donec enim diam vulputate ut pharetra sit amet aliquam id. Gravida rutrum quisque non tellus. Donec ultrices tincidunt arcu non. Ut aliquam purus sit amet. Pulvinar neque laoreet suspendisse interdum consectetur. Non enim praesent elementum facilisis leo vel fringilla est ullamcorper. Interdum varius sit amet mattis vulputate enim. Sagittis vitae et leo duis ut. Commodo quis imperdiet massa tincidunt nunc pulvinar sapien. Erat imperdiet sed euismod nisi porta. Nulla facilisi nullam vehicula ipsum a arcu cursus vitae. Amet aliquam id diam maecenas ultricies mi eget. Sit amet nulla facilisi morbi tempus iaculis urna id volutpat. Volutpat consequat mauris nunc congue nisi vitae. Sagittis eu volutpat odio facilisis mauris. A arcu cursus vitae congue mauris rhoncus. Amet purus gravida quis blandit. Faucibus vitae aliquet nec ullamcorper sit amet. Sed egestas egestas fringilla phasellus faucibus scelerisque eleifend donec pretium.

Issues Ratio:

Dispositive:

Other Notes:

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

Digest.ph

AIC Grande Tower Garnet Road
Ortigas Center, Pasig City
Metro Manila Philippines

Mobile No. +639451244898
digestph@gmail.com

Legal Research

Resources

Legal