Should Law Students Use AI Humanizers to Avoid Detection Tools? - Blog

From legal research to drafting legal documents, AI tools can offer different kinds of assistance and help lawyers and paralegals save their valuable resources and manage tight deadlines. As a modern law student or practitioner, it is important to embrace AI and modern technology if you want to stay ahead of the increasing competition.

AI tools can no doubt enhance automation, but you must know that content generated through AI tools, despite being logically accurate, gets flagged by AI detection tools. Being accused of cheating via AI can damage the credibility of a student or even a lawyer, which is why you have to use relaible ai humanizer.

In this guide, we are going to discuss in detail the burning question: “Should Law Students Use AI Humanizers to Avoid AI Detection Programs?”

Let’s start from the basics…

What are AI Text Humanizer Tools?

AI humanizer tools are cloud-based utilities that take AI-generated content or any material written by ChatGPT or other language models and rephrase it in a way that sounds more human and natural.

The main function and goal of humanizer tools is to rewrite text in such a way that it outsmarts AI detector tools like Detecting AI. A humanizer relies on natural language processing, machine learning, and other advanced models, which makes them capable of understanding the meaning and context of AI-generated text and rephrasing it in a human-like manner.

Should Lawyers Use AI Text Humanizer Tools?

As a law student, you would have to write multiple assignments, which can be quite hectic. This is why you would see that a lot of students from all around the world rely on generative tools to get free help.

The problem is that when a law student uses AI to generate or paraphrase legal assignments and then uses AI humanizer tools to avoid detection programs like Turnitin, they are not just crossing guidelines set by their teachers but also breaching the ethical code, which is important for being a good lawyer.

Academic integrity is taken very seriously in law schools as compared to other institutes, and this is because legal studies and the profession itself are based on ethical standards, rules & regulations, intellectual honesty, and most importantly, trust.

So, if a student is solely relying on AI content generators and humanizers, they are simply cheating and aren’t learning anything. Below, we have given arguments that you need to consider before making a choice.

Arguments for Using AI Humanizer Tools

Managing the workload of law schools can be quite challenging. Students can use AI text generator tools to get help in research work and collecting ideas or information. An AI humanizer can help students simplify the wording of AI text and make it more digestible. By using AI as a research partner, students can save a lot of time.
Non-native English students facing language barriers can take help from AI humanizers to simplify the reference material they’ve been given by teachers, or they can also use it to simplify legal ideas they get online or through generative tools.
Some law schools don’t have clear policies about the use of AI for managing assignments. This leaves room for personal judgment and allows students to streamline their tasks using humanizers and other utilities.
One of the biggest reasons why we support the use of AI humanizers is that modern detector tools are not perfect. They are likely to give you a false positive, meaning they can flag human-written content as AI-written. So if your content gets falsely accused of being written by GPT or any other LLM, you can use an AI humanizer to bypass it.

Arguments Against Using AI Humanizer Tools

The main function of AI humanizer tools, as mentioned earlier, is to prevent AI detection and outsmart tools such as Turnitin. This is a direct form of academic dishonesty, which should be condemned.
Relying on an AI humanizer means that you have generated text through LLMs. This means you have not engaged with the assignment as your teacher or school expected.
If future lawyers start their careers by misrepresenting their work through humanizers and paraphrasing tools, what ethical corners might they cut down the road?
There are tons of humanizing options online, but the majority of them are still in their beta stages and are not capable of revising text humanely. These tools can further disrupt the quality of text.

These are some of the convincing arguments that would make you question whether you should use humanizers or not!

Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence in Law Schools

The fact of the matter is that AI isn’t going anywhere; rather, it will be growing at a rapid pace in the upcoming years. Law firms are already using AI tools for different tasks such as research, document review, proofreading, contract analysis, etc.

So, schools and teachers need to promote the transparent use of AI so that students don’t indulge in cheating and other unethical practices. Here are some tips for consideration:

AI should be used for brainstorming ideas or creating outlines, not for creating content or building arguments.
If the school allows the use of AI or is silent on its use, students must provide proper credits for the work they have received assistance with.
When in law school, you are training to be a lawyer, you need to ensure that your work reflects your voice, so always make sure that you build your arguments and present your opinion or perspective.

What Happens If You’re Caught Using AI Generators & Humanizers?

Most law schools have set strict policies on the use of AI and plagiarism (academic misconduct). If you are caught using AI, especially after trying to mask it with a humanizer, you could face the following consequences:

Failing grade or suspension
Bad note on your academic record
Disciplinary hearings
Damage to your reputation

In a profession where character and fitness evaluations are part of the bar exam process, this is not a risk you want to take lightly, so we would advise you to be very smart about using AI in law school.

Conclusion

AI humanizer or AI to Human Text Converter has become very popular these days because of its ability to rephrase robotic text humanely and bypass detection programs. But in law school, where your integrity and analytical abilities are tested at every stage, taking a shortcut is not going to be worth it if you get caught.

In our opinion, the risks outweigh the benefits, which is why we suggest not using AI tools for content creation, paraphrasing, or revisions. Rather, we suggest students use AI text humanizers as their helping aid for simplifying technical language or legal jargon that they don’t understand.