{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Citibank vs. Urban Development Bank
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
New
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Citibank vs. Urban Development Bank
SEC CASE NO. 3002 (Order)
August 13, 1987
Tags
Securities and Exchange Commission
SEC Office Orders
Corporate
Citibank vs. Urban Development Bank
SEC CASE NO. 3002 (Order)
•August 13, 1987
[SEC CASE NO. 3002. August 13, 1987.]IN RE: PETITION WITH APPOINTMENT OF REHABILITATION RECEIVER FOR REYNOLDS PHILIPPINE CORPORATION PURSUANT TO P.D. 902-A, AS AMENDED,CITIBANK, N.A., ET AL., petitioners, vs. URBAN DEVELOPMENT BANK, ET AL., oppositors.O R D E RActing upon the "Second Motion for Reconsideration" filed by Reynolds Philippine Corporation, through counsel, which seeks to reconsider the Order of this Commission dated October 24, 1986, which is just a mere clarification of the dispositive portion of its previous Order dated June 23, 1986, and it appearing that the grounds alleged therein are exactly the same grounds alleged in its first motion for reconsideration and considering that said "Second Motion for Reconsideration" is considered pro-forma, the same should be, as it is hereby, DENIED. SCaITASO ORDERED. (SGD.) FELIPE S. TONGCOHearing Officer (SGD.) JAMES K. ABUGAN(SGD.) ROLANDO C. MALABONGAHearing OfficerHearing Officer
Login to see full content
Tags
Securities and Exchange Commission
SEC Office Orders
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>