[SEC CASE NO. 3210. October 21, 1987.]
CONPHARM INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL., petitioners, vs. ALFREDO A. SANTILLANA, respondent.
O R D E R
Submitted for resolution are: 1 ) the Motion For Reconsideration dated September 11, 1987, filed by the counsel for the respondent; and 2) the Motion To Require Respondent To Turn Over The Office and Records of Conpharm To The Petitioner Ney S. Chua dated September 12, 1987 filed by the petitioners as well as the respective oppositions and the replies filed thereto. IaHAcT
We have gone over the arguments as adduced by both partied in all the pleadings filed both in support and in opposition to the motion of respondent seeking to reconsider the order of this commission dated September 7, 1987, and upon consideration of the same, we find no justifiable reason to warrant the reversal of the order sought to be reconsidered. The respondent's arguments as advanced therein are the same arguments which were duly considered by this Commission on the questioned order. The motion for reconsideration, therefore is hereby DENIED. IcSHTA
Anent the motion...
