{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
In re CJH Development Corp.
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
New
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
In re CJH Development Corp.
SEC CDO Case No. 05-12-006 (Resolution)
November 3, 2017
Tags
Securities and Exchange Commission
SEC Commission En Banc
Corporate
In re CJH Development Corp.
SEC CDO Case No. 05-12-006 (Resolution)
•November 3, 2017
November 3, 2017SEC CDO CASE NO. 05-12-006IN THE MATTER OF CJH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND CJH SUITES CORPORATIONENFORCEMENT AND PROSECUTION DEPARTMENT, movant.FOR : Issuance of Permanent CDORESOLUTIONFor the consideration of the En Banc is a Motion for Issuance of Permanent Cease and Desist Order filed on 9 July 2012 by the Enforcement and Prosecution Department (EPD). 1 The Motion essentially stated that:(1) A Cease and Desist Order (Order) against Respondents was issued by the Commission En Banc on 7 June 2012;(2) The CDO was served on Respondent CJH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (CJH Dev't.) on 8 June 2012;(3) The CDO was served on Respondent CJH SUITES CORPORATION (CJH Suites) on 13 June 2012;(4) Neither of the Respondents filed a Motion to Lift filed within the 5-day period in the 2006 SEC Rules of Procedure. On 13 July 2012, Respondents filed a Manifestation stating that the EPD's Motion is superfluous, since the CDO was not issued by an Operating Department but rather by the En Banc itself, viz.:[I]t must be emphasized that, assuming in gratia argumenti the validity of...
Login to see full content
Tags
Securities and Exchange Commission
SEC Commission En Banc
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>