{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" role="button" data-tip="Copy Link">
Juanito Valencia vs. Solidlink Futures, et al.
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Collections
Create new Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" role="button" data-tip="Copy Link">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Juanito Valencia vs. Solidlink Futures, et al.
SEC-SICD Case No. 03-96-5300
April 12, 1999
Tags
Securities and Exchange Commission Departments
SEC Securities Investigation and Clearing Department
Corporate
Juanito Valencia vs. Solidlink Futures, et al.
SEC-SICD Case No. 03-96-5300
•April 12, 1999
[SEC-SICD * CASE NO. 03-96-5300. April 12, 1999.]JUANITO VALENCIA, complainant, vs. SOLIDLINK FUTURES, ET AL., respondents.D E C I S I O NBefore this Commission is a complaint for unlawful solicitation and trading of respondents Solidlink and C & T Global as well as against its accountable officers and employees. It was alleged that by virtue of an illegal scheme perpetrated by all of the respondents conspiring with each other, and with the intention of defrauding herein complainant, the former willfully caused the latter to invest P150,000.00 with Solidlink and another P100,000.00 with C & T Global. Complainant further narrated that the respondent corporations allowed an unlicensed broker to solicit & trade from him these investment in direct violation of the REVISED RULES AND REGULATIONS ON COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING enacted by the Securities & Exchange Commission pursuant to Sec. 7 of the Revised Securities Act. cdllPetitioner prayed for the return of his investment with interest of 5% per month starting from the date that the investment was made. Moral and exemplary damages were also asked...
Login to see full content

Tags
Securities and Exchange Commission Departments
SEC Securities Investigation and Clearing Department
Corporate
Juanito Valencia vs. Solidlink Futures, et al.
SEC-SICD Case No. 03-96-5300
•April 12, 1999
[SEC-SICD * CASE NO. 03-96-5300. April 12, 1999.]JUANITO VALENCIA, complainant, vs. SOLIDLINK FUTURES, ET AL., respondents.D E C I S I O NBefore this Commission is a complaint for unlawful solicitation and trading of respondents Solidlink and C & T Global as well as against its accountable officers and employees. It was alleged that by virtue of an illegal scheme perpetrated by all of the respondents conspiring with each other, and with the intention of defrauding herein complainant, the former willfully caused the latter to invest P150,000.00 with Solidlink and another P100,000.00 with C & T Global. Complainant further narrated that the respondent corporations allowed an unlicensed broker to solicit & trade from him these investment in direct violation of the REVISED RULES AND REGULATIONS ON COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING enacted by the Securities & Exchange Commission pursuant to Sec. 7 of the Revised Securities Act. cdllPetitioner prayed for the return of his investment with interest of 5% per month starting from the date that the investment was made. Moral and exemplary damages were also asked...
Login to see full content

Tags
Securities and Exchange Commission Departments
SEC Securities Investigation and Clearing Department
showFlash = false, 6000)">
Digest AI