[SEC-SICD * CASE NO. 4069. March 7, 2000.]
LUCERIA B. MANGOMA, ET AL., complainants, vs. RAMON MANGOMA, ET AL., respondents.
D E C I S I O N
In their complaint, the complainants pray that the Commission resolve that: a) the scheme and devices employed and the acts committed by the respondents be declared as without valid authority, fraudulent, and detrimental to the interests of complainants; b) the complainants/petitioners be declared as the rightful and lawful officers of the corporation; c) the respondents be sentenced to undo what they have done and restore the corporation to its former position ante their fraud and misrepresentation; or d) if such restoration is no longer possible or feasible, the respondents be sentenced to pay the complainants/petitioners the amount of P946,000.00 to Luceria Mangoma and the sums of P20,000.00 each to Rosario Mangoma and Roldan Cubangbang, exclusive of interests; e) the respondents be likewise sentenced to pay damages, the kind and the amount of which are left to the sound judgment of this Commission; f) the respondents for compelling the petitioners to...
