{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Zosimo Rivas vs. Ezekiel F. Toeg, et al.
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
New
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Zosimo Rivas vs. Ezekiel F. Toeg, et al.
SEC-AC No. 025
April 21, 1980
Tags
Securities and Exchange Commission
SEC Commission En Banc
Corporate
Zosimo Rivas vs. Ezekiel F. Toeg, et al.
SEC-AC No. 025
•April 21, 1980
[SEC-AC NO. 025. April 21, 1980.](SEC CASE NO. 1719)ZOSIMO RIVAS, ET AL., petitioners, vs. EZEKIEL F. TOEG, ET AL., respondents.O R D E RBefore the Commission en Banc is an appeal from the Order of May 31, 1979, granting the issuance of the writ of preliminary injunction enjoining respondents/appellants from performing the acts therein sought to be restrained. LLphilReading the appealed Order, the decisive factor in the issuance of the writ of injunction apparently was the resolution of the City Fiscal of Manila in I.S. No. 79-47-40 finding prima facie case of theft against respondents therein, the same herein appellants Ezekiel F. Toeg, Teodoro Bundang and Jacob (James) Isaac. This finding, however, was lately reversed by the Minister of Justice in his letter-directive to the City Fiscal of Manila (See Annex 1, appellants' Manifestation and Motion). This being the case, the appealed Order should be reversed, the very foundation upon which the writ of preliminary injunction was issued had ceased to exist.WHEREFORE, the appealed Order is hereby reversed and, accordingly, the writ of preliminary injunction...
Login to see full content
Tags
Securities and Exchange Commission
SEC Commission En Banc
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>