{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Preventive Suspension Cases
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
New
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Preventive Suspension Cases
Policy Instructions No. 10-76
April 23, 1976
Tags
Department of Labor and Employment
DOLE Policy Instructions
Labor
Preventive Suspension Cases
Policy Instructions No. 10-76
•April 23, 1976
April 23, 1976POLICY INSTRUCTIONS NO. 10-76TO:All Regional Directors SUBJECT:Preventive Suspension Cases Before PD 850, the employers placed workers under preventive suspension flagrantly and indiscriminately — even if their presence in the worksite did not pose a serious danger to the life or property of the employer or his employees. Through preventive suspension, the employer made a farce of the clearance requirement before termination as well as of the constitutional guarantee of employment tenure. While the termination case was hibernating in the arbitration system, compulsory or voluntary, the worker was out of work under preventive suspension.Under PD 850, the Regional Director is adequately empowered to stop these abuses. He is to rule on preventive suspension, whether actual or potential, within ten (10) working days. If the presence of the employee does not pose a serious danger, he is to order reinstatement with backwages or prevent the employer from imposing preventive suspension. Regardless of his order, however, the employer may place the employee under preventive suspension if the employer would keep the employee in his payroll while...
Login to see full content
Tags
Department of Labor and Employment
DOLE Policy Instructions
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>