Romano v. Prado

 [BLR-A-AE-30-18-10-17. January 17, 2018.](NCR-CFO-AE-01-17-03-15)IN RE: PETITION FOR AUDIT OF FUNDS OF POLANNE TRANSPORT DRIVERS & EMPLOYEES UNION (PTDEU-FSM)ANTONIO A. ROMANO, ALFREDO VALERIO, ANTONIO ASILO, VINCENT RAMOS AND JONATHAN DEGUIT, petitioners-appellees, vs. ANTONIO PRADO AND ROGELIO ABSULO, respondents-appellants.RESOLUTIONFor resolution is the Motion for Reconsideration filed by Antonio Prado and Rogelio Absulo (Prado, et al., for brevity) from the Resolution dated 06 December 2017 issued by this Office, the dispositive portion of which reads: WHEREFORE, premises considered, the Memorandum of Appeal of Antonio Prado and Rogelio Absulo is hereby DISMISSED. The Order dated 06 September 2017 of DOLE NCR Mediator-Arbiter Belinda S. Evangelista-Conge is hereby AFFIRMED.SO RESOLVED.In their Motion for Reconsideration, Prado, et al., asserted that this Office erred in its findings: (a) that DOLE NCR Mediator-Arbiter Belinda S. Evangelista-Conge did not commit grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction; (b) that the principle of exhaustion of administrative remedies and the requirement for certification of non-forum shopping can be relaxed given the circumstances of the case; and (c) that there was no quorum...