Romano v. Prado

PDF
Word
Overview Full Text
Details
Case Agency Issuance Number Published Date

Romano v. Prado

BLR-A-AE-30-18-10-17 (NCR-CFO-AE-01-17-03-15)

December 6, 2017

Tags

Bureau of Labor Relations

BLR Decisions

Labor

Romano v. Prado

BLR-A-AE-30-18-10-17 (NCR-CFO-AE-01-17-03-15)

December 6, 2017

[BLR-A-AE-30-18-10-17. December 6, 2017.](NCR-CFO-AE-01-17-03-15)IN RE: PETITION FOR AUDIT OF FUNDS OF POLANNE TRANSPORT DRIVERS AND EMPLOYEES UNION (PTDEU)-FSMANTONIO ROMANO, ALFREDO VALERIO, ANTONIO ASILO, VINCENT RAMOS, AND JONATHAN DEGUIT, petitioners-appellees, vs. ANTONIO PRADO AND ROGELIO ABSULO, respondents-appellants.RESOLUTIONThis resolves the Memorandum of Appeal filed by Antonio Prado and Rogelio Absulo from the Order dated 06 September 2017 issued by DOLE NCR Mediator Arbiter Belinda S. Evangelista-Conge, the dispositive portion of which reads: WHEREFORE, premises considered, immediate restitution must proceed as follows:a.) The respondents, Antonio Prado and Rogelio Absulo, must restitute the amount of sixteen thousand five hundred pesos (P16,500.00) representing medical assistance. However, respondents after restitution may claim reimbursement from the concerned beneficiaries as listed above.b.) Respondent Antonio Prado should immediately remit to the union funds the amount of forty-four thousand pesos (P44,000.00) representing the increase of monthly allowance of the union president, as computed by the Audit Examiner.c.) The respondents, Antonio Prado and Rogelio Absulo, should immediately remit to the union funds the amount of one hundred nine thousand four hundred sixty-five and 50/100 (P109,465.50), representing...
Login to see full content
Romano v. Prado

Tags

Bureau of Labor Relations

BLR Decisions