{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
In Re: Mariano Manas
Download as PDF
Download as Word
My Notes
Highlights
New
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
In Re: Mariano Manas
Executive Order No. 3
January 1, 1970
Case Overview and Summary
Summary of Executive Order No. 3Mariano Manas Ineligibility for Provincial Board Membership
- Mariano Manas received plurality of votes for 3rd member of Laguna Provincial Board in 1912 elections.
(Legal Basis: Section 3 of Act No. 1582, Section 3 of Act No. 2045, Section 1 of Act No. 2170)
- Supreme Court ruled the Chief Executive can consider ineligibility of elected provincial official before induction into office.
(Legal Basis: Topacio vs. Paredes et al. case)
- In 1896, Mariano Manas was convicted of falsification of public documents by Audencia Territorial de Manila.
- Sentenced to 12 years imprisonment, perpetual absolute disqualification, civil interdiction, and surveillance by authorities.
- Conviction not reversed and Manas not pardoned or restored to civil/political rights.
- Mariano Manas deemed morally unfit to hold public office.
- Executive declines to confirm Mariano Manas' election as 3rd member of Laguna Provincial Board.
(Legal Basis: Section 25 of Act No. 1582, as amended by Section 3 of Act No. 1726)
Amends
n/a
Amended by
n/a
Tags
Executive Issuances
Executive Orders
Mariano Manas
Laguna Provincial Board
election ineligibility
falsification of public documents
conviction
imprisonment
disqualification
civil interdiction
surveillance
pardon
moral unfitness
executive order
confirmation of election
Law
In Re: Mariano Manas
Executive Order No. 3
•January 1, 1970
EXECUTIVE ORDER No. 3
Whereas Mariano Manas has been certified by the provincial board of Laguna, acting as a board of canvasser, to have received a plurality of the votes legally cast for third member of the provincial board of Laguna in the general elections held in the said province of June fourth, nineteen hundred and twelve, under the provisions of section three of Act Numbered Fifteen hundred and eighty-two, section three of Act Numbered Two thousand and forty-five, section one Act Numbered Twenty-one hundred and seventy; and
Whereas the Supreme Court of the Philippine Islands in the case of Topacio vs. Paredes et al. (Vol. X No. 44, Official Gazette, p.1830) held that under the law at present it is not only proper for the Chief Executive to consider questions of ineligibility of an elective provincial official when the matter is brought before him after the election but before the latter's induction into office but this is the only remedy available now to prevent an ineligible person from holding an elective provincial office; and...
Login to see full content
Amends
n/a
Amended by
n/a
Tags
Executive Issuances
Executive Orders
Mariano Manas
Laguna Provincial Board
election ineligibility
falsification of public documents
conviction
imprisonment
disqualification
civil interdiction
surveillance
pardon
moral unfitness
executive order
confirmation of election
EXECUTIVE ORDER No. 3
Whereas Mariano Manas has been certified by the provincial board of Laguna, acting as a board of canvasser, to have received a plurality of the votes legally cast for third member of the provincial board of Laguna in the general elections held in the said province of June fourth, nineteen hundred and twelve, under the provisions of section three of Act Numbered Fifteen hundred and eighty-two, section three of Act Numbered Two thousand and forty-five, section one Act Numbered Twenty-one hundred and seventy; and
Whereas the Supreme Court of the Philippine Islands in the case of Topacio vs. Paredes et al. (Vol. X No. 44, Official Gazette, p.1830) held that under the law at present it is not only proper for the Chief Executive to consider questions of ineligibility of an elective provincial official when the matter is brought before him after the election but before the latter's induction into office but this is the only remedy available now to prevent an ineligible person from holding an elective provincial office; and...
Login to see full content
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>