SPEEDY TRIAL ACT OF 1998
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Collections
Create new Collection
Overview
Full Text
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
SPEEDY TRIAL ACT OF 1998
Republic Act No. 8493
February 12, 1998
Case Overview and Summary
Summary of Republic Act No. 8493 (Speedy Trial Act of 1998)Mandatory Pre-Trial in Criminal Cases (Section 2)
- Judges shall order a pre-trial conference after arraignment to consider:
- Plea bargaining
- Stipulation of facts
- Marking of evidence
- Waiver of objections to evidence
- Other matters to promote fair and expeditious trial
Pre-Trial Agreement (Section 3)
- Agreements made during pre-trial shall be in writing and signed by the accused and counsel.
- Court approval is required for plea bargaining agreements.
Non-appearance at Pre-Trial (Section 4)
- Sanctions or penalties may be imposed on counsel or prosecutor for non-appearance without acceptable excuse.
Pre-Trial Order (Section 5)
- Court shall issue an order reciting actions taken, facts stipulated, and evidence marked.
- The order shall bind the parties and control the course of trial.
Time Limit for Trial (Section 6)
- Trial shall be set for continuous trial within 180 days from the first day of trial, except as authorized by the Chief Justice.
Time Limit Between Filing and Arraignment, and Arraignment and Trial (Section 7)
- Arraignment shall be within 30 days from filing of information or accused's appearance.
- Accused shall have at least 15 days to prepare for trial after arraignment.
- Trial shall commence within 30 days from arraignment.
Time Limit Following Order for New Trial (Section 8)
- Trial shall commence within 30 days from the order for new trial, extendable up to 180 days if impractical.
Extended Time Limit (Section 9)
- For the first 12 months, the time limit from arraignment to trial is 180 days.
- For the second 12 months, the time limit is 120 days.
- For the third 12 months, the time limit is 80 days.
Exclusions from Time Computation (Section 10)
- Periods of delay resulting from:
- Other proceedings concerning the accused
- Absence or unavailability of the accused or essential witness
- Mental incompetence or physical inability of the accused
- Dismissal and re-filing of the same charge
- Joinder with a co-accused over whom the court has no jurisdiction
- Continuance granted by the court if the ends of justice outweigh the interests of speedy trial
Factors for Granting Continuance (Section 11)
- Failure to grant continuance would make proceedings impossible or result in miscarriage of justice.
- The case is so novel, unusual, or complex that adequate preparation is unreasonable within the time limits.
Public Attorney's Duties for Imprisoned Accused (Section 12)
- Public attorney shall promptly undertake to obtain the presence of imprisoned accused for trial.
- Person having custody shall advise the imprisoned accused of the right to demand trial.
Remedy for Failure to Bring Accused to Trial Within Time Limit (Section 13)
- Information shall be dismissed on motion of the accused, with or without prejudice.
- Court shall consider factors like seriousness of offense, circumstances leading to dismissal, and impact on administration of justice.
Sanctions (Section 14)
- Court may impose fines or deny the right to practice for counsel or prosecutor who:
- Knowingly allows setting for trial without disclosing unavailability of witness
- Files frivolous motions solely for delay
- Makes false statements to obtain continuance
- Willfully fails to proceed to trial without justification
Rules and Regulations (Section 15)
- Supreme Court shall promulgate rules, regulations, and orders to accelerate disposition of criminal cases.
- Sanctions shall be provided against judges who willfully fail to proceed to trial without justification.
Funding (Section 16)
- ₱20,000,000.00 shall be appropriated annually from the Supreme Court's allocation for implementation.
Act Not a Bar to Speedy Trial Claim Under the Constitution (Section 17)
- The Act shall not bar any claim of denial of speedy trial under the Constitution.
Repealing Clause (Section 18)
- Inconsistent laws, decrees, orders, rules, and regulations are repealed or modified.
Separability Clause (Section 19)
- If any provision is declared unconstitutional, the other provisions shall remain in effect.
Effectivity (Section 20)
- The Act shall take effect 15 days after publication in the Official Gazette or a newspaper of general circulation.
- Section 7 shall become effective after the third 12-month period provided in Section 9.
Amends
n/a
Amended by
n/a
Tags
Statutes
Republic Acts
speedy trial
criminal cases
pre-trial conference
time limits
exclusions
sanctions
dismissal
arraignment
trial
continuance
public prosecutor
counsel
accused
witness
imprisonment
funding
rules and regulations
Law
SPEEDY TRIAL ACT OF 1998
Republic Act No. 8493
•February 12, 1998
Republic of the Philippines
Congress of the Philippines
Metro Manila
Tenth Congress
Republic Act No. 8493 February 12, 1998
AN ACT TO ENSURE A SPEEDY TRIAL OF ALL CRIMINAL CASES BEFORE THE SANDIGANBAYAN, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT, MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT, AND MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT, APPROPRIATING FUNDS THEREFOR, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the Philippines in Congress assembled::
Section 1. Title. - This Act shall be known as the "Speedy Trial Act of 1998."
Section 2. Mandatory Pre-Trial in Criminal Cases. - In all cases cognizable by the Municipal Trial Court, Municipal Circuit Trial Court, Metropolitan Trial Court, Regional Trial Court, and the Sandiganbayan, the justice or judge shall, after arraignment, order a pre-trial conference to consider the following:
(a) Plea bargaining;
(b) Stipulation of Facts;
(c) Marking for identification of evidence of parties;
(d) Waiver of objections to admissibility of evidence; and
(e) Such other matters as will promote a fair and expeditious trial.
Section...
Login to see full content
Amends
n/a
Amended by
n/a