An interlocutory orde​r cannot be the subject of appeal until final judgment is rendered for one party or the other. Further, the Court has previously distinguished certiorar​i, as a mode of appeal under Rule 45, as a remedy that involves the review of the judgment, award, or final order on the merits, as compared to the original action for certiorar​i under Rule 65, which refers to a remedy that may be directed against an interlocutory orde​r. No appeal may be taken from an interlocutory orde​r. Instead, the proper remedy to assail such an order is to file a petition for certiorar​i under Rule 65. (Prime Savings Bank v. Spouses Santos G.R. No. 208283 (Resolution) June 19, 2019)