{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Carlos v. Department of Finance-Revenue Integrity Protection Service
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
New
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Carlos v. Department of Finance-Revenue Integrity Protection Service
CA-G.R. SP No. 138169 (Resolution)
June 28, 2016
Tags
Court of Appeals
CA Decisions
Taxation
Carlos v. Department of Finance-Revenue Integrity Protection Service
CA-G.R. SP No. 138169 (Resolution)
•June 28, 2016
FORMER SPECIAL SEVENTEENTH (17TH) DIVISION[CA-G.R. SP NO. 138169. June 28, 2016.]JESSIE JAVIER CARLOS, petitioner, vs. DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE-REVENUE INTEGRITY PROTECTION SERVICE and OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, respondents.RESOLUTIONGONZALES-SISON, M., J p:This resolves the Motion for Reconsideration filed by petitioner dated December 04, 2015 of this Court's Decision dated October 27, 2015 the dispositive portion of which reads: "WHEREFORE, the petition is GRANTED in PART. The October 25, 2012 Decision and the October 25, 2014 Joint Order of the Office of the Ombudsman in OMB-C-A-11-0775-1 (LSC) are hereby REVERSED and SET ASIDE and a new one is entered finding petitioner Jessie Javier Carlos guilty of DISHONESTY and imposing upon him the penalty of DISMISSAL from the service, with the penalties of cancellation of eligibility, forfeiture of retirement benefits, and perpetual disqualification for reemployment in the government service."SO ORDERED.A perusal of the motion reveals that the arguments raised by petitioner have been thoroughly passed upon in the assailed Decision. There being no merit in the motion, the same must perforce fail.WHEREFORE, the Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED.SO ORDERED.Cruz...
Login to see full content
Tags
Court of Appeals
CA Decisions
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>