{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Commissioner of Customs v. Court of Tax Appeals
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
New
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Commissioner of Customs v. Court of Tax Appeals
CA-G.R. SP No. 78564
May 3, 2006
Tags
Court of Appeals
CA Decisions
Taxation
Commissioner of Customs v. Court of Tax Appeals
CA-G.R. SP No. 78564
•May 3, 2006
SIXTEENTH DIVISION[CA-G.R. SP No. 78564. May 3, 2006.]COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, petitioner, vs. COURT OF TAX APPEALS and PILIPINAS SHELL PETROLEUM CORPORATION, respondents.D E C I S I O NDE LOS SANTOS, J p:Assailed before Us on certiorari under Rule 65 of the Revised Rules of Court is the resolution dated January 28, 2003 of public respondent Court of Tax Appeals (CTA), denying herein public petitioner's Motion to Dismiss, which interposed lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a cause of action, the petition for review, docketed as C.T.A. Case No. 6484, filed by herein private respondent with the CTA on May 23, 2002, as well as CTA's resolution denying petitioner's motion for reconsideration of its January 28, 2003 order. The petition for certiorari relies on the following grounds, to wit;"ISINCE RESPONDENT SHELL'S PETITION FOR REVIEW WAS FILED WAY BEYOND THE PERIOD ALLOWED BY LAW, THEREBY MAKING THE DEMAND OF THE BUREAU OF CUSTOMS FOR SAID RESPONDENT TO RETURN THE EQUIVALENT AMOUNT OF THE SUBJECT TAX CREDIT CERTIFICATES IT HAD USED TO PAY THE IMPORT DUTIES...
Login to see full content
Tags
Court of Appeals
CA Decisions
showFlash = false, 6000)">